Difference of Teaching Evaluation Grade according Make Subject-level CQI in the Liberal Arts Courses |
Young Ju Hur |
교과목 CQI 작성 여부에 따른 교양교과목 강의평가 점수의 차이 |
허영주 |
|
|
Abstract |
The purpose of this study is to analyze the difference of the student evaluation of teaching that professor in charge of the liberal arts courses whether or not make subject-level CQI to achieve the purpose of the research. Subjects for this inquiry were student evaluation grade of teaching(postscore) on first semester in 2018 of 121 liberal arts subjects courses(445 courses including divided sub-classes) of N University in Chungcheongnam-do. Class type and student evaluation grade of teaching(pre-score) on first semester in 2017 must be modeled as covariate, have done a analysis of multi-way MANCOVA. The statistically significant difference results are listed below. First, teaching evaluation grade of professor to make subject-level CQI was higher 0.13 than it of professor not make subject-level CQI. Second, to make subject-level CQI was high all five sub-factors of student evaluation of teaching. According to estimated values of the parameters when homogenization student evaluation grade of teaching(pre-score), teaching evaluation grade of professor to make subject-level CQI was higher 0.14 on teaching planning grade, 0.17 on teaching method grade, 0.12 on teaching management grade, 0.11 on teaching evaluation grade, 0.13 on teaching classroom environment grade, than it of professor not make subject-level CQI. This allows the following suggestion. To manage the quality of education, to make subject-level CQI have a strong, in particular for teaching planning, teaching method, teaching evaluation. But the topic creating of subject-level CQI must be remedied for teaching management and teaching evaluation. And a follow-up research is needed study about reinforcing method of subject-level CQI, as topic development of subject-level CQI creating and establishment operation rule, analysis influence of subject-level CQI including student’s educational effectiveness. |
Key Words:
교과목 CQI, University education, educational quality, liberal-arts, student evaluation of teaching, subjectlevel CQI |
|